What If the Time Spent *Was* the Point?

* Reclaiming Meaning in the Age of Instant Everything*

I’m from early Generation X, raised with a particular dream: that AI and robotics would *finally* liberate humanity from drudgery. Not to make us lazier, but to give us the freedom to pursue *nobler* things: philosophy, art, reflection, even idleness with purpose.

That dream still flickers. But lately, it’s flickering in the shadow of something darker: not a future of liberation, but one of numbing convenience, where meaning is bypassed in the rush for efficiency, and the effort that once made life feel rich is treated like a bug in the system.

A recent article summed up this fear powerfully. It argued that we're systematically destroying the biological reward system that makes effort feel worthwhile. Not by accident, but *on purpose*. In our quest to eliminate friction from life, we’ve also eliminated the very struggle our brains are wired to reward. The satisfaction of cooking, creating, learning, and slowly improving ourselves is being hijacked by shortcuts. And the terrifying part? We’re learning to prefer the shortcut.

When I was younger, the promise of AI was that it would *serve* us, doing the repetitive tasks so we could dedicate ourselves to the things that matter: truth-seeking, creative expression, understanding what it means to be human. But instead, we risk becoming consumers of hollow perfection. Why wrestle with writing when ChatGPT can do it faster? Why learn to draw when text-to-image tools can produce a masterpiece in seconds? Why bother with trial and error when an algorithm can bypass the process entirely?

Because maybe, just maybe, the process *was the point*.

We are not just dopamine-fueled reward-chasers. We are effort-driven meaning-makers. Our brains are structured to *enjoy progress*, not just outcomes. The long hours spent learning an instrument, the pain of failing at a sketch, the frustration of revising a half-baked idea, these aren’t side effects. They’re the heart of what makes achievement feel real.

The more we optimize for instant results, the more we erode our capacity to feel rewarded. A meal you cooked yourself tastes better than one delivered by an app. A sentence you agonized over carries more weight than one a machine drafted. A picture you *finally* learned to draw, even if imperfect, holds more soul than something you prompted into existence in five seconds.

This isn't a romantic rejection of technology. I’m not anti-AI. I’m *pro-intention*. AI can be an extraordinary tool for amplifying human creativity. But we need to be crystal clear about what we’re trying to preserve. Otherwise, we risk training ourselves, and especially the next generation, that effort is obsolete, and convenience is king. We may gain time, but we’ll lose meaning.

And what are we doing with that saved time, anyway? If AI cooks, writes, and creates for us, do we spend our freed hours in deep thought? In philosophy? In community? Often, no. We spend them doomscrolling, binge-watching, or numbing ourselves further. Instead of liberation, we get a kind of spiritual quiet quitting.

There’s still a way out. but it requires a deliberate shift. If we want to avoid the “dopamine collapse” described in that article, we need to redesign our relationship with effort and technology.

We must reclaim **effort as meaning**.

That means designing systems that *enhance* human creativity, not replace it. It means using AI to challenge and collaborate, not just to create shortcuts. It means reintroducing *friction* into learning, art, and problem-solving , not as inefficiency, but as *intentional practice*.

We need to stop seeing struggle as a flaw and start seeing it as an essential part of human growth. Struggle gives us texture, story, identity. It’s the thing AI can’t replicate, because struggle requires *consciousness*, patience, and time.

We also need to teach people not just how to use AI, but how to remain *human* while using it. This is where philosophy comes back in. Not as an academic exercise, but as a survival tool. In a world where everything is getting easier, philosophy teaches us how to ask harder questions. What is a good life? What is worth our time? What is the value of effort in a world of instant reward?

We can still build a future where AI and robots liberate us. But liberation isn’t the same as luxury. It’s not about doing nothing. It’s about doing *the right things*. It’s about choosing depth over speed.

Philosophy isn’t a luxury anymore. It’s a necessity. If AI is going to serve us, we need to know *what* we want to be, and *why*. Otherwise, the machines won’t enslave us. We’ll simply forget what it ever felt like to be free.

---